header-logo header-logo

08 February 2018
Issue: 7780 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Assistants wanted to support Supreme Court justices

The Supreme Court has announced its latest round of applications for judicial assistants.

Up to seven new assistants are appointed each year for a one-year placement supporting the justices, with tasks including research, joining them in court for hearings, and drafting summaries for the press. Since the Court opened in 2009, about 60 candidates have been successful in securing one of these limited placements.

Chloe Bell, currently assistant to Lord Mance, said: ‘It is a real privilege to have the opportunity to engage with Supreme Court Justices on some of the most interesting legal issues in the country and to learn from the advocates involved in them.’

Candidates must be solicitor, barrister or advocate-qualified with a view to pursuing a career in advocacy, and should have completed a pupillage or training contract before the starting date. Further details are available here. Applications close at midnight on Wednesday, 28 March.

Issue: 7780 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll