header-logo header-logo

14 May 2021 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Features , Property , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Ashes to ashes, dust to dust: property rights in body parts

48976
Mark Pawlowski considers whether English law recognises property rights in a dead body or bodily parts
  • English and Commonwealth caselaw on the recognition of dead bodies, body parts and bodily products as ‘property’.

The general rule is that when a human being dies, property in their body does not vest in anyone, although certain persons have duties, and thus rights, with respect to it. In Williams v Williams (1882) 20 Ch D 659, at p664, Kay J stated: ‘The law of this country recognises no property in a corpse’. It is for this reason that testamentary directions with regard to the disposal of one’s corpse (‘I wish to be cremated and my ashes scattered . . .’) are, at best, precatory.

In Dobson v North Tyneside Health Authority [1996] 4 All ER 474, the Court of Appeal confirmed the orthodox view that, subject to certain limited exceptions, there is no property in a dead body under English law. The case concerned a claim by the next of kin to the deceased’s brain which,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll