header-logo header-logo

14 October 2022 / David Langwallner
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property , Commercial , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Artistic parody: Making a mockery

97406
In UK law, artistic parodies remain in a grey area between freedom of expression & protecting commercial reputations, as David Langwallner explains

It is arguable that most art is, on some level or another, homage or parody. If we take the late paintings of Picasso, many involved reworkings of the tropes of European art, including 58 paintings alone based on Diego Velázquez’s Las Meninas. ‘I borrow from the best’ is the rule of great art.

In terms of artists of the classical heritage, the most parodied artist is arguably Leonardo da Vinci—from Marcel Duchamp’s famous parody of The Mona Lisa, to a 2005 Last Supper-style advertisement which caused considerable controversy for the French fashion house responsible, and was banned in Italy and France. Parody is close to the edge.

Though da Vinci is outside of copyright protection on account of the ‘life plus 70 years’ rule, art galleries continue to litigate extensively—with mixed results—for their copyright in reproductive images, and argue that parody does reputational harm and damages commercial interests.

Parody protection: the US approach

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll