header-logo header-logo

27 May 2020 / William Tyzack
Issue: 7888 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Property
printer mail-detail

Arrested development

21415
Development in lockdown: the pitfalls of an approaching deadline & compliance with permission conditions. William Tyzack reports
  • Minimal commencement of works: an obvious solution?
  • Difficulty in complying with pre-commencement conditions: the options available.
  • Coronavirus: challenges of protecting the workforce.

Pursuant to s 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) development work subject to a grant of planning permission must be begun within a period of three years, unless the planning authority has imposed, when granting permission, a different duration (whether longer or shorter). It is, furthermore, not permissible for a planning authority to extend the deadline by agreement with the landowner or developer. Conditions controlling the way in which the planning permission must be implemented may also be imposed by the planning authority, which may include works that are required to take place before the development work begins. These ‘pre-commencement works’ could include, for instance, discontinuance of any existing land use, removal of buildings, certain access or drainage works, or landscaping.

While recent relaxation of lockdown restrictions, coupled with the modification of the government’s ‘stay-at-home’ message

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll