header-logo header-logo

20 September 2007 / Helen Darling , Katherine Hill
Issue: 7289 / Categories: Features , EU , Wills & Probate , Banking
printer mail-detail

Are we there yet?

Is a coherent EU anti-money laundering approach to trusts within reach? ask Helen Darling and Katherine Hill

The passage of the Third European Money Laundering Directive 2005/60/EC (the Directive) into domestic law, scheduled for 15 December 2007, has not been as smooth as the government hoped. The first draft of the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (the draft regulations) was published in January this year to widespread criticism from representative bodies including the Law Society and the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. Concerns focused predominantly on the impact of Pt 2 of the draft regulations dealing with customer due diligence (CDD) and, particularly, a perceived failure to provide clarity on how CDD requirements apply to trusts.
Concerted lobbying by domestic bodies and, ultimately, intervention by the European Commission resulted in the definition of beneficial ownership contained in the draft regulations being significantly amended. In July 2007 the revised Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/2157) (the regulations) were published in what the government has stated is their final form. The changes appear to have pacified the English trust community. However, the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll