header-logo header-logo

Are finders still keepers?

14 February 2025 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Features , Property , International
printer mail-detail
207996
Who owns lost treasures once they have been found? Michael L Nash unearths some peculiarities in the law of possession & ownership

On 6 February 1987, I wrote an article for NLJ under the heading of ‘Are Finders Keepers?’, 137 NLJ 118, based on the case of Elwes v Brigg Gas Co (33 Ch D 562) in 1885. Since then, a great deal has happened in the world of possession and ownership, on which this celebrated case was based. Could the owner of land own objects under the surface—sometimes a very long way under—of which they had no knowledge whatsoever? Or, in giving a lease to another to excavate, did what the lessee found belong to them, given that they had no knowledge either of what they did find, in course of their excavation?

Who owns what?

The property law of England became largely, though not entirely, the result of evolution, rather than revolution. The English, or the British perhaps, have always been loath to abandon anything quaint or whimsical, which is so much part and parcel of a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll