header-logo header-logo

31 May 2007 / Richard N M Anderson
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

An arctic breeze

An impending House of Lords’ case should provide guidance about the way husband and wife businesses may be taxed, says Richard Anderson

The case of Jones v Garnett (Inspector of Taxes) arose as the result of a combination of events. A couple met and married in 1981. She worked in management until 1989 when she left her employment to start a family. He worked in IT as an employee of a number of public companies until about 1989 when he was made redundant. They decided that their best option was to set up their own business and become self-employed. The wife, they decided, would assist for some hours using the management and accounting skills she had learned while working, but would also stay at home looking after the family and the home, supporting her husband in this new venture and leaving him free to devote to it all of his energies.

options

There are several ways in which the couple could have put that decision into effect—the husband could have been a sole trader; they could have gone into partnership together; or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll