header-logo header-logo

Arbitration—Reinsurance

08 November 2017
Issue: 7769 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Insurance / reinsurance , Arbitration , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tonicstar Ltd (on its own behalf and on behalf of the other corporate members of Lloyd's Syndicates 62, 1861 and 2255) v Allianz Insurance plc (Formerly Cornhill Insurance plc) and another [2017] EWHC 2753 (Comm), [2017] All ER (D) 46 (Nov)

The court had the power to remove an arbitrator on the grounds that he did not possess the necessary qualifications, pursuant to s 24(1) of the Arbitration Act 1996. Further, applying settled law, a Queen's Counsel, with considerable experience as a lawyer in insurance and reinsurance disputes, was not qualified to act as an arbitrator, within the meaning of cl 15.5 of a contract of reinsurance (incorporating the Joint Excess Loss Committee excess loss clauses). Where cl 15.5 had been adopted, the tribunal was to consist of persons from the trade or business of insurance and reinsurance. The Commercial Court so ruled in granting the claimant's application for an order that a QC be removed as an arbitrator on the ground that he was not qualified to act as such. The application arose out of a reinsurance dispute, following a settlement of liabilities resulting from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll