header-logo header-logo

06 September 2023
Issue: 8039 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

Arbitration reforms announced

The Law Commission has recommended a series of reforms to the Arbitration Act 1996, including extending immunity so that arbitrators are protected from liability when they resign or are removed.

The commission, which published its final recommendations and draft legislation this week following an 18-month review, said strengthened immunity would support the arbitrator to make robust and impartial decisions without the fear of being sued.

Other recommendations include codifying the law on arbitrators’ duty to disclose conflicts of interest while retaining current duties on impartiality. The commission suggested arbitrators be able to summarily dismiss legal claims that lack merit. It recommended clarifying the power of the courts to support arbitration proceedings and emergency arbitrators, as well as improvements to the framework for challenging jurisdiction.

In terms of disputes between parties over the governing law that should apply, the commission recommended a default rule in favour of the law of the seat. The commission said this would ‘have the virtues of simplicity and certainty’ and ‘would see more arbitration agreements governed by the law of England and Wales, when those arbitrations are also seated here’.

Overall, however, the commission concluded the central tenets of the Act continue to function well. It considered whether to introduce provisions on confidentiality, but decided there was no need for reform as the law is working well.

Law commissioner Professor Sarah Green said: ‘With these improvements, we hope that the Act provides a modern and effective legislative framework for many years to come, enabling arbitration to continue playing a significant role in the UK economy.’

Nick Vineall KC, chair of the Bar Council, expressed support for the proposals and welcomed the commission’s ‘characteristically careful and balanced review’.

Vineall said: ‘It is extremely important that the government finds parliamentary time for the short Bill which the Law Commission proposes.

‘London has a well-deserved reputation as the foremost centre for international arbitration. It is important to legislate to make the modest changes to the arbitration regime which the Law Commission has recommended in order to maintain and enhance that reputation.’

Justice minister Lord Bellamy said the government would respond shortly to the recommendations.

Issue: 8039 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll