header-logo header-logo

04 August 2011
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40, [2011] All ER (D) 246 (Jul)

The essential questions in relation to regs 2 and 6 of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660), were whether, on the one hand, the person concerned performed services for and under the direction of another person in return for which he or she received remuneration or, on the other hand, he or she was an independent provider of services who was not in a relationship of subordination with the person who received the services.

Those were broad questions which depended upon the circumstances of the particular case and upon a detailed consideration of the relationship between the parties. The Regulations were not applicable to the selection, engagement or appointment of arbitrators, and accordingly the requirement in an arbitration agreement that the arbitrators should be members of the Ismaili community did not render the agreement void or unenforceable. 
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll