header-logo header-logo

04 August 2011
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40, [2011] All ER (D) 246 (Jul)

The essential questions in relation to regs 2 and 6 of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660), were whether, on the one hand, the person concerned performed services for and under the direction of another person in return for which he or she received remuneration or, on the other hand, he or she was an independent provider of services who was not in a relationship of subordination with the person who received the services.

Those were broad questions which depended upon the circumstances of the particular case and upon a detailed consideration of the relationship between the parties. The Regulations were not applicable to the selection, engagement or appointment of arbitrators, and accordingly the requirement in an arbitration agreement that the arbitrators should be members of the Ismaili community did not render the agreement void or unenforceable. 
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

NEWS
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
back-to-top-scroll