header-logo header-logo

04 August 2011
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40, [2011] All ER (D) 246 (Jul)

The essential questions in relation to regs 2 and 6 of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660), were whether, on the one hand, the person concerned performed services for and under the direction of another person in return for which he or she received remuneration or, on the other hand, he or she was an independent provider of services who was not in a relationship of subordination with the person who received the services.

Those were broad questions which depended upon the circumstances of the particular case and upon a detailed consideration of the relationship between the parties. The Regulations were not applicable to the selection, engagement or appointment of arbitrators, and accordingly the requirement in an arbitration agreement that the arbitrators should be members of the Ismaili community did not render the agreement void or unenforceable. 
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll