header-logo header-logo

08 January 2010
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Broda Agro Trade (Cyprus) Ltd v Alfred C. Toepfer International GmbH [2009] EWHC 3318 (Comm), [2009] All ER (D) 176 (Dec)

A person might inform an arbitration tribunal of his view that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction without being held to have taken part in the arbitration proceedings.

However, if he made submissions to the tribunal for it to take into account when exercising its jurisdiction to rule on its own substantive jurisdiction, he risked being held to have taken part in the arbitration proceedings. Section 72 of the Arbitration Act 1996 stated that the condition to be satisfied by a person wishing to avail himself of that section was that he “takes no part in the proceedings”.

It did not state in terms that the condition to be satisfied was that he “takes no part in the proceedings in order to challenge the jurisdiction of the arbitration”. There was no reason to imply any such condition. Section 72 provided that a person who took no part in the arbitration proceedings might question the jurisdiction of the tribunal by seeking a declaration or injunction.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll