header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Dolphin Tanker Srl v Westport Petroleum Inc [2010] EWHC 2617 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 199 (Oct)

It was established law that the general rule on an appeal from an arbitration award on a point of law was that only the award and the relevant contract should be put before the court. That rule applied whether the appeal was brought by agreement under s 69(2)(a) of the Act or leave under s 69(2)(b) of the Act, since in each case the appeal to the court had to be on a question of law arising from the award. An appeal on a question of law was confined to facts found by the award. It was irrelevant whether the court considered those findings of fact to be wrong. There was a confined category of case where either the award had set out the relevant contractual terms in an abbreviated form, or had summarised the effect of an identified contractual exchange or had identified particular documents as having contractual effect without setting out their terms. Those were circumstances in which it might be appropriate for a party to invite the court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll