header-logo header-logo

04 April 2014 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7601 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

April showers

Janna Purdie provides an overview of the forthcoming CPR changes

Various CPR changes come into force during April this year. Here we review those changes coming into force on 22 April relating to costs budgeting. Note: the provisions are currently in draft and are therefore subject to change when laid before Parliament.

Costs budgeting exemptions

Lord Jackson, in his costs report, favoured all multi-track cases being subject to costs budgeting. However, as we all know, last April saw a number of different exemptions and whether they applied depended on a variety of factors eg the court the matter was proceeding in, the value of the claim or the type of claim. This caused an imbalance between the courts and less transparency for practitioners. From 22 April 2014 this is all set to change with the following changes coming into force:

  • costs budgeting will only apply to Pt 7 claims;
  • the existing exemptions are to be removed; and
  • a much more workable blanket exemption is being put into place such that costs budgeting will not apply to cases with a value of £10m or more unless
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll