header-logo header-logo

28 January 2010 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Approach with care

Dr Chris Pamplin explains how to save money without damaging the supply of expert witnesses

In recent years, pressure on public finances has driven down fees for those lawyers who still work in the publicly funded arena. Fee capping and fixed fee schemes have played their part. Clearly, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) believes that what was sauce for the lawyer goose will be sauce for the expert witness gander.

In its consultation paper, Legal Aid: Funding Reforms, the MoJ claims to recognise that quality expert evidence is essential for the effective running of the civil and criminal justice systems. Yet it proposes the unsophisticated application of arbitrary banding and capping of the fee rate of those expert witnesses paid out of the Legal Aid fund, with a maximum hourly fee of £100.

Based on a decade’s-worth of survey data (www.jspubs.com/downloads/PDFs/UKREW_MoJ_Nov09.pdf) gathered by the UK Register of Expert Witnesses, this action will represent an approximate halving of the average fee rates for medical expert witnesses.
Doubtless few lawyers will worry much about expert witnesses earning less money from future publicly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll