header-logo header-logo

28 January 2010 / Roger Smithers
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Appeal to reason

Roger Smithers resolves some Pt 52 conundrums

Anyone contemplating a second tier civil appeal would do well to reflect carefully on the provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules before embarking on the process. Indeed, in this article it is suggested that the meaning and full effect of Pt 52 of the CPR with regard to the requirement for permission is not as clear as it might be.

If this seems a surprising view after some nine years under the new regime, consider this: most practitioners will be aware that permission to appeal is generally required. What is not so widely appreciated is that there can only be one application for permission to appeal to any one appeal court in the same proceedings. If that is refused, that is the end of the line. 

The CPR

Rule 52.3 deals with permission and provides:
(2) An application for permission to appeal may be made-
(a) to the lower court at the hearing at which the decision to be appealed  was made; or
(b) to the appeal court in an appeal notice.
(3) Where the lower court refuses an application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll