header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Appeal court clears air on community design rights

News

The first ruling on the scope of the Registered Community Design Right  (CDR) has been handed down by the Court of Appeal.

Bird & Bird, which acted for Reckitt Benckiser in its high-profile dispute with Procter & Gamble says the case has major significance for designers and brands worldwide.

Bird & Bird partner, Lorna Brazell, says the case is groundbreaking as this is the first authoritative guidance on the CDR and has also set an important precedent in Europe, clarifying for the first time what constitutes the protection available to an original design.

In February 2006, Procter & Gamble sued Reckitt Benckiser over the design of the container of its air freshener Air Wick Odour Stop, claiming it infringed the Registered Community Design which it had obtained for its Febreze product.

The High Court ruled in favour of Procter & Gamble, finding that the two designs were too similar, but the appeal court this week overruled this decision asserting that  there was sufficient difference of detail between them. 

Brazell says the decision is important for all brand owners and all those involved in consumer product industries where the use of designs is paramount.

“We now have clear guidance on what protection an original design can attract and significantly a systematic approach to get there.”

Issue: 7293 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll