header-logo header-logo

30 March 2007
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Appeal

Sumukan Ltd v Commonwealth Secretariat [2007] EWCA Civ 243, [2007] All ER (D) 341 (Mar)

(i) The Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to consider an appeal from the High Court about the existence of an agreement excluding the right of appeal under the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996), s 69(1). There is a distinction between those cases where the court is assisting or overseeing the
arbitration process and those cases where the question is whether or not the jurisdiction of the court has been excluded. In the context of s 69, there is a distinction between a decision about whether or not the parties have agreed to exclude the court and—if they have not—the decision about whether or not to grant or refuse permission to appeal. Until the court has decided whether or not there is an exclusion agreement, it does not engage on the considerations relevant to the question whether or not permission to appeal should be refused or granted.

(ii) As a matter of domestic law, a contract might incorporate by reference an exclusion agreement limiting the right of appeal under AA 1996, s 69. The court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll