header-logo header-logo

15 January 2014
Issue: 7590 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Another protest expected

Criminal practitioners “likely” to attend further protest

Another day of protest by criminal practitioners could take place in mid-February, subject to the relevant groups’ agreement.

Thousands of barristers and solicitors opted to stay out from court on the morning of 6 January, with counsel dressed in wigs and gowns waving placards on the steps outside instead.

Speaking after a meeting of the Criminal Law Solicitors Association (CLSA) last week, Bill Waddington, chair of the CLSA, said the strong turnout may have caused the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) to again postpone its response to the consultation—a delay which “can only give cause for optimism”.

He said it was “likely” that another protest day will take place, should the MoJ not change course, “ideally a couple of weeks after the government’s response to the consultation”, which is expected towards the end of January.

Meanwhile, ongoing meetings will take place between the CLSA, London Criminal Court Solicitors Association, Criminal Bar Association and Legal Aid Practitioners Group to decide what happens next.

Writing in his chairman’s blog, Waddington said: “Remember [the MoJ] were due to respond to the consultation by the 18 December.  

“That slipped to the 7 January and it has slipped further again to what we are told is likely to be ‘towards the end of January’. That slippage can only be due to the fact that the MoJ has got plenty to think about. I am not going to criticise them for thinking carefully about what happens next.”

He said “strong financial arguments” were under discussion that might demonstrate the required £220m savings by 2018 are not required.

Issue: 7590 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll