header-logo header-logo

Another Gray(ling) day for justice

05 March 2014 / Dr Jon Robins
Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Jon Robins records the next steps in the government’s “dismantling” of publicly-funded law

Another month, another stand-off between the justice secretary and the legal profession. Defence lawyers are expected to march on the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) for a “Grayling Day” demo on Friday in a protest which will include speakers such as Paddy Hill of the Birmingham Six and Shami Chakrabarti of Liberty.

The government finally announced its response to the Transforming Legal Aid consultation last week. To remind civil law practitioners, this was a package of reforms which had at its heart the imposition of a system of price competitive tendering (PCT) where: (i) the number of solicitors’ firms would be slashed from 1,600 to 400; and (ii) bids would have to be 17.5% below current rates. So, for “transforming”, read “dismantling”. 

The Law Society forced a series of concessions from Chris Grayling (principally, dropping PCT and ensuring defendants kept their right to choose their own lawyer) but, for their efforts, received a humiliating vote of no confidence at a specially convened AGM

A disaster

Representative groups

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll