header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail

Another fine mess

Stephen Levinson discusses the law affecting care workers after Allen

The need to protect vulnerable adults in care and children in schools, nurseries and other places is self-evident. This case is about the legal system that ensures that those who pose a risk are not allowed to care for them. Brought by the Royal College of Nurses, it related to those who look after adults but the system is the same as that previously established for the protection of children under the Education Reform Act 1988 and the Protection of Children Act 1999 (PCA 1999). The political impetus for that law was driven by the public outcry against paedophiles.

Unsuitability

The system adopted by the Care Standards Act 2000 (CSA 2000) is that care workers employed in looking after vulnerable adults may be placed on a list of people considered unsuitable for the work (the POVA, Protection of Vulnerable Adults, list). Once on the list on a provisional or confirmed basis the care worker is banned from such employment. The question was whether the delay that occurred before any form of judicial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll