header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail

Another fine mess

Stephen Levinson discusses the law affecting care workers after Allen

The need to protect vulnerable adults in care and children in schools, nurseries and other places is self-evident. This case is about the legal system that ensures that those who pose a risk are not allowed to care for them. Brought by the Royal College of Nurses, it related to those who look after adults but the system is the same as that previously established for the protection of children under the Education Reform Act 1988 and the Protection of Children Act 1999 (PCA 1999). The political impetus for that law was driven by the public outcry against paedophiles.

Unsuitability

The system adopted by the Care Standards Act 2000 (CSA 2000) is that care workers employed in looking after vulnerable adults may be placed on a list of people considered unsuitable for the work (the POVA, Protection of Vulnerable Adults, list). Once on the list on a provisional or confirmed basis the care worker is banned from such employment. The question was whether the delay that occurred before any form of judicial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll