header-logo header-logo

06 October 2011
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Animals

Bodey v Hall [2011] EWHC 2162 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 149 (Sep)

The claim was brought in connection with an accident which occurred while the parties were in a pony trap. Both were experienced horsewomen. The claimant was acting as groom, while the defendant was driving. It was not clear whether or not the claimant wore a riding hat at the instant time. The horse became startled and rushed forward, so that the claimant and defendant were thrown onto the ground.

The claimant sustained a severe head injury. In subsequent proceedings, it was held that, in order to determine whether the requirements of s 2(2)(a) of the Animals Act 1971 were satisfied, it was necessary to consider the particular circumstances of the instant case, and not to only consider the animal itself and whether it was likely to cause severe personal injury.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll