header-logo header-logo

Anger as compensation levy triples

01 October 2024
Issue: 8088 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors’ contributions to the Compensation Fund are to rise from £30 to £90 for individuals and from £660 to £2,220 for firms, the Legal Services Board (LSB) has confirmed

The increases, due to take effect this month as solicitors renew their practising certificates, have arisen as a result of Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) interventions ‘into 65 legal services practices in 2022/23 including Metamorph Group and Axiom Ince’, the SRA said. This brought total expenditure from the fund to £64.9m, up from £22.4m the previous year.

Consequently, the fund’s reserves dropped to a low point of £18.7m in July 2023.

The SRA says it anticipates collecting £31.6m in 2024/25—a ‘significant’ increase on this year’s £10m—which it considers ‘will set the Compensation Fund at a level where it can continue to be managed on a sound financial basis’.

However, Law Society chief executive officer Ian Jeffery described the increase as ‘deeply concerning’.

Jeffery said: ‘We also strongly encourage the SRA to prioritise its focus on core activities and only undertake additional workstreams based on evidence of regulatory need, or specific gaps in responding to consumer needs, rather than looking for additional fining powers.

‘In our consultation response, the Law Society asked the SRA to reconsider how the levy was apportioned, to ensure the burden was distributed fairly, and to take proactive measures to prevent future substantial claims. Solicitors are steadfast in their wide support for the Compensation Fund, as a vital protection for clients, and it clearly delineates the profession from unregulated providers of legal services.’

Tensions between the Law Society and SRA have also escalated over proposals to increase fining powers on solicitors. In June, the SRA proposed introducing two more fining bands: Band E, 6-10% of a firm’s annual domestic turnover and 113-115% of an individual’s income; and Band F, 11-25% of annual domestic turnover and upwards of 145% of an individual’s income.

However, Law Society vice president Richard Atkinson said the proposals were ‘unfair, disproportionate and potentially unlawful’, and risked cutting the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal ‘out of the process’ even though the tribunal has a wider range of sanctions available.

Issue: 8088 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll