header-logo header-logo

13 October 2011 / Mark Surguy , Tracey Stretton
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

An altered state

Tracey Stretton & Mark Surguy predict that change is in the air for litigation costs

In his review of the costs of civil litigation, Lord Justice Jackson suggests that a formal costs management process is needed to keep the costs of litigation in check and makes recommendations about the need for budgeting and the monitoring of costs by judges. Pilot projects have been run over the past two years, including a pilot in the Mercantile Court and Technology and Construction Courts in Birmingham. The Civil Procedure Rules Committee recently approved the extension of this pilot to every Mercantile Court and Technology and Construction Court in the country.

The target date for the implementation of various reforms suggested by Jackson LJ, including the introduction of the costs management process, is 1 October 2012. A new practice direction on costs management is expected to be introduced in October 2012, once the necessary changes to the civil procedures rules have been authorised and enabling legislation passed. In the meantime, a new practice direction 51G

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll