header-logo header-logo

28 January 2010 / Eleanor Morgan , Willie Manners
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

All or nothing

When should administrators pay the rent? by Willie Manners & Eleanor Morgan

At the end of last year, the High Court handed down its decision in Goldacre (Offices) Limited v Nortel Networks UK Limited (in administration) [2009] EWHC 3389 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 54 (Jan). The court had to consider what payment was due in respect of rent where the administrator had used a small part of premises let to a company in administration.

Following Re ABC Coupler and Engineering Co (No 3) [1970] 1WLR 702, it is well established that if an administrator occupies an insolvent company’s premises for the conduct of the administration, this use is for the benefit of the insolvent company’s creditors and any rent falling due after the date of the winding up order will be payable as an expense of the administration during the period of such use.

Rent will, therefore, be paid by the administrator from the assets of the company before paying preferential creditors, creditors with floating charges or unsecured creditors. In practical terms for the landlord, this means that he is likely

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll