header-logo header-logo

24 July 2013 / Janet Barlow , Rebecca Mason
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

All marriages are equal...

169856308_0

...but some are more equal than others, say Janet Barlow & Rebecca Mason

The controversial Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act received royal assent last week. This Act is a ground-breaking piece of legislation which aims to put same sex couples on a level footing with that of heterosexual couples in relation to the institution of “marriage”. The Act will enable same sex couples to marry either in a civil ceremony or, if in agreement with the religious organisation, in a religious ceremony. The Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004) had already given same sex couples the ability to make a legally recognised commitment to one another. However, this has never been regarded as a marriage due to Canon law. The Submission of the Clergy Act 1533, Canon B30, states that “the Church of England affirms, according to our Lord’s teaching that marriage is in its nature a union permanent and lifelong, for better for worse, till death them do part, of one man with one woman...” This was reaffirmed by Lord Penzance in Hyde v Hyde and Woodhouse (1866) LR

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll