header-logo header-logo

23 October 2019
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

All Hallows Brexit unlikely

Ratification of Withdrawal Agreement Bill put on hold… for now 

EU leaders have indicated a Brexit extension will be granted, following the latest defeat for the government.

MPs voted 329-299 to move the prime minister’s withdrawal agreement bill to the second reading stage, where a number of amendments are likely to be sought, including membership of a customs deal and putting the agreement to the public in a remain versus withdrawal agreement referendum.

Following this victory, however, the prime minister’s hopes of a Halloween Brexit were all but dashed within the hour when MPs rejected by 322-308 votes his accelerated timetable to push the 110-page Bill through Parliament within three days. Prime Minister Johnson immediately paused the Bill, reneging on an earlier threat to abandon it altogether.

Donald Tusk, president of the European Commission, later that evening indicated an extension to the Art 50 process would be granted, tweeting: ‘Following PM @BorisJohnson’s decision to pause the process of ratification of the Withdrawal Agreement, and in order to avoid a no-deal #Brexit, I will recommend the EU27 accept the UK request for an extension. For this I will propose a written procedure.’

The prime minister had previously requested an extension to 31 January 2020, in compliance with the Benn Act (European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019).

Simon Parsons, formerly associate professor of law at Solent University, said the second reading of the withdrawal agreement bill would be ‘a historic moment in the Brexit saga’ and Boris Johnson ‘will now be able to say in the inevitable general election campaign that he has the right deal for the country’.

However, Sir Keir Starmer, shadow Brexit secretary, said the proposed withdrawal agreement, which only runs until the end of 2020, contains a ‘trapdoor’ to a no-deal Brexit.

Moreover, the prime minister has lost the support of the Democratic Unionist Party due to the agreement’s ‘border in the Irish sea’ and the revelation that Northern Ireland businesses will have to fill out export declaration forms when sending goods to Great Britain.

A general election could be called if two-thirds of MPs agree or if a vote of no confidence is passed and opposition MPs are unable to form an alternative government within two weeks.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll