header-logo header-logo

26 May 2011 / Felicia Epstein
Issue: 7467 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

All in good faith

When does an employee owe fiduciary duties, asks Felicia Epstein

It has become common, in the employment context, to assert the existence of a duty of fidelity distinct from fiduciary duties. As Robert Flannigan pointed out in his article “The [Fiduciary] Duty of Fidelity” ((2008) 124 LQR 274), the duty of fidelity is an invention and “faith, good faith, fidelity and loyalty arguably are too closely associated with conventional fiduciary responsibility to serve usefully as sharp descriptors of other functions”. Perhaps for this reason, it is difficult to distinguish between an employee’s duty of fidelity and any fiduciary duties they may owe. It has been commonly stated that all employees are subject to a duty of fidelity but only those in a position with specific powers and responsibilities have fiduciary duties that would include reporting their own misconduct or that of fellow employees.

Global Risks

In Lonmar Global Risks Ltd v West and others [2011] IRLR 138 the claimant sued Tyser Limited, a competitor in the international intermediary brokering market, and three employees who had left Global Risks to join Tyser.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll