header-logo header-logo

16 February 2022
Issue: 7967 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

All about client reputation

Lawyers aim to ensure client’s reputation doesn’t precede them

Digital media, growth in class actions and a rise in cross-border disputes has made protection of a client’s reputation increasingly important, lawyers believe. Yet the use of specialist public relations (PR) consultants remains low.

Three-fifths of respondents said they consider reputational impact when advising clients and more than three-quarters agreed litigation PR is necessary in a client’s legal strategy, in a Byfield Consultancy survey of corporate counsel, law firm partners, silks, litigation funders and public relations (PR) advisors. However, only eight per cent said they always involve external PR consultants when advising clients.

Byfield highlights in its report, Finding the right line: litigation PR in an evolving dispute ecosystem, published last week that while reputation has always been an important consideration during litigation, several factors are increasing demand. These include the growth in class actions, the speed of news stories in the digital media era and the increasing volume of cross-border disputes, where ‘it is key for litigators, clients and PR advisers to be familiar with the nuances in media culture, litigation practices, reporting restrictions and PR approaches across several jurisdictions’.

Most of the respondents also agreed environmental, social and governance (ESG) will be a dominant theme in future disputes, which adds an extra layer of reputational risk as non-ethical conduct will play out on a public stage, affecting a business’s ability to acquire investment and talent.

While the litigation PR sector is well established in ‘litigious societies’ such as New York, this is not the case in areas newer to dispute resolution, such as Dubai, where clients and the press are more conservative.

Gus Sellito, co-founder of Byfield Consultancy, said: ‘With the increase of media interest, particularly in areas of conduct and ESG, companies and others who are involved in disputes will need to manage the narrative around these “clickbait” issues. Litigation PR will be more important than ever as these issues begin to take centre stage.’

Issue: 7967 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll