header-logo header-logo

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Aircraft

Pindell Ltd and another v Airasia Berhad [2010] EWHC 2516 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 133 (Oct)

Late return of an aircraft under an aircraft operating lease could be distinguished from late return of a vessel under a time-charter for a vessel. A ship was very different in nature from an aircraft. It was obvious that the latter was far more vulnerable to a technical problem which would render it wholly, if temporarily, unusable. Ships did sufferer major engine breakdown, but the range of problems having a similarly paralysing effect was obviously far smaller than in the case of an aircraft. Secondly, an aircraft operating lease was significantly different in character from a time chart party. Under a time charter, the owner retained possession of the ship and was responsible for its maintenance and for its crewing and navigation. Under an operating lease, the position was very different. The lessee took possession of the aircraft and became responsible for its maintenance and insurance. After delivery of the aircraft, engines and every part were at the sole risk of the lessee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll