header-logo header-logo

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Aircraft

Pindell Ltd and another v Airasia Berhad [2010] EWHC 2516 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 133 (Oct)

Late return of an aircraft under an aircraft operating lease could be distinguished from late return of a vessel under a time-charter for a vessel. A ship was very different in nature from an aircraft. It was obvious that the latter was far more vulnerable to a technical problem which would render it wholly, if temporarily, unusable. Ships did sufferer major engine breakdown, but the range of problems having a similarly paralysing effect was obviously far smaller than in the case of an aircraft. Secondly, an aircraft operating lease was significantly different in character from a time chart party. Under a time charter, the owner retained possession of the ship and was responsible for its maintenance and for its crewing and navigation. Under an operating lease, the position was very different. The lessee took possession of the aircraft and became responsible for its maintenance and insurance. After delivery of the aircraft, engines and every part were at the sole risk of the lessee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll