header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
19 April 2024 / Tom Bedford
Issue: 8067 / Categories: Features , Profession , Artificial intelligence , Technology , Career focus
printer mail-detail

AI: asset or liability for lawyers?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
Tom Bedford predicts potential trip-hazards ahead & suggests ways to smooth the artificial intelligence road
  • Reminds lawyers to be aware of the limitations of AI.
  • Predicts negligence and duty of care claims arising from AI use.
  • Provides points to help firms get the switch to AI right.

According to ChatGPT, ‘AI can potentially be both an asset and a liability for law firms, depending on how it’s utilised and managed.’

We agree. Generative AI models are already demonstrating an ability to undertake legal research, review contracts and summarise legal documents. Given the current rate of technological advancement, AI will fundamentally alter the practice of law.

It is also popular, and firms are feeling the pressure to jump on the AI bandwagon in order to appear innovative and to maintain competitive edge. Reportedly, 75% of the largest firms in the UK are now using AI in some way.

Firms must remember, however, that AI has limitations. The current generation of AI chatbots possess a huge amount of knowledge, but not wisdom. They cannot exercise judgement. They

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll