header-logo header-logo

01 October 2009
Issue: 7387 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Agreement reached on fixed costs for road accidents

Three-tier streamlined process to apply from April 2010

The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has brokered an agreement between claimants and insurers to set fixed costs and time limits for road accident claims.

The agreement, reached following a lengthy process of discussions and mediation, sets up a three-tier streamlined process, and will apply from April 2010. Only claims that can be settled for £10,000 or less will be included. Fatal accidents, accidents involving children, and accidents where contributory negligence is alleged, will be excluded.

The agreed fixed costs will be: £400 for Stage 1 (the claimant solicitor completes the claim notification form and sends it to the insurer who may admit/deny liability); £800 for Stage 2 (where liability is admitted, the claimant obtains a medical report and the process continues with offers and negotiation of a settlement to a strict timetable); and £250 paper hearing/£500 oral hearing for Stage 3 (where the parties cannot agree a settlement and the case goes to court).

Craig Butler, solicitor in charge of motor accident claims at Bond Pearce, says: “I’ve breathed a sigh of relief at what’s been agreed. The concern was that, if fees were driven too low, then claimants’ access to independent legal advice would disappear, but this is not a situation where claimant lawyers will have to shut up shop.

“I think there are gains to be made on all sides here. Insurers will make savings because of the reduction in litigation. The claimant may get speedier and fairer settlements, and has retained access to independent legal advice. For claimant’s representatives, the deal is not as bad as we feared, it is sustainable.”

Robert Musgrove, CJC chief executive, adds: “These predictable costs, together with the previously agreed costs and success fees, allow a significant proportion of the less complex injury claims to be resolved more quickly and proportionately.”

Issue: 7387 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll