header-logo header-logo

11 January 2007
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

AG under spotlight

In brief

The Constitutional Affairs Committee has decided to inquire into the constitutional position of the Attorney General—Lord Goldsmith—after the decision to abandon the Serious Fraud Office inquiry into alleged corruption in BAE Systems’ arms deal with Saudi Arabia. Alan Beith, who chairs the influential committee, says the inquiry will examine the functions of the Attorney General vis-à-vis his role as superintending minister for legal services provided in government, including the Crown Prosecution Service, and will consider whether this role conflicts with his duties as a member of the government. “In the light of recent events where the [Lord Goldsmith] has had to make decisions about highly political subjects involving prosecutions, the constitutional role of the Attorney General as part of the framework of upholding the rule of law has taken on an unusual importance,” Beith adds.

Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll