header-logo header-logo

09 October 2014
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Aero Club business rate reversal

Upper Tribunal overturns President’s landmark decision

A landmark decision on business rates has been overturned by the Lands Chamber (Upper Tribunal). 

In the case, which involved West London Aero Club, the Valuation Tribunal had held that once it had given its decision on the rateable value, that value couldn’t be amended by a valuation officer (VO) even where the officer believes he is correcting an error (regarding the size of a hangar, in this case). The airfield relied on the principle of res judicata or issue estoppel to argue that the officer was not entitled to ignore or impugn the tribunal’s decision.

Ruling in the airfield’s favour, the Tribunal President, Graham Zellick QC considered that “to countenance the valuation officer’s argument would be subversive of the rule of law, an affront to justice, repugnant to the statutory framework”. On appeal, however, the Lands Chamber has reversed the President’s decision ( Valuation Office Agency v West London Aero Club [2014] UKUT 0291 (LC)). It held that res judicata did not apply and a valuation officer can alter a rating list when he becomes aware of a material change in circumstances because he is under a duty to maintain an accurate list. Giving his judgment, Martin Rodger QC said: “A mistake of fact made by the Valuation Tribunal need not be perpetuated.”

Richard Jones, a property consultant who advised the airfield, commented that the Upper Tribunal decision was based “purely on the legalities” of the VO’s actions and powers.

“It also took into account a previous Valuation Tribunal ruling and the impact of this on the VO’s ability to alter the 2005 rating list. However, no consideration was given to the correctness or otherwise of the confirmed overall rateable value in light of comparable properties, nor to any quantum value reduction in relation to the increased areas of the hangars,” he added.

Issue: 7625 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll