header-logo header-logo

27 July 2017 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7756 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Advocate General drops holiday pay bombshell

Could gig economy workers have a right to claim backdated holiday pay? Charles Pigott reports

  • Advocate General Tanchev has given an opinion which could open the way to substantial claims for backdated holiday pay from gig economy workers.
  • This new approach would provide an added incentive for employers to get their workers’ employment status right at the outset of the relationship.

The Advocate General’s opinion in King v the Sash Window Workshop C-214/16 would put the onus squarely on employers to provide an ‘adequate facility’ for the exercise of the right to take paid annual leave under the Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC (WTD).

The opinion was given on 8 June 2017, in response to a request for a reference from the Court of Appeal. That followed an appeal by Mr King from the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal [2015] IRLR 348. Mr King had been working as a commission only salesman since 1999. He had been categorised as self-employed, and had refused a new contract as an employee on different terms and conditions in 2008. He brought a number of claims

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll