header-logo header-logo

28 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Adoption agency victory

A Catholic child adoption agency has won a High Court case that could allow it to lawfully discriminate against same-sex couples.

A Catholic child adoption agency has won a High Court case that could allow it to lawfully discriminate against same-sex couples.

In Catholic Care v the Charity Commission and the Equality and Human Rights Commission [2010] EWHC 520 (Ch), Catholic Care sought an exemption from the Sexual Orientation Regulations 2007, which make it unlawful to discriminate on the ground of sexual orientation in the provision of goods or services.

The agency, which has achieved success in finding parents for “hard to place” children, argued that it operates within the tenets of the Roman Catholic Church, including a strong belief in the sanctity of marriage. It provides services to couples only if they are married. It claimed it had found it impracticable to find a way round the regulations and continue operating.
Delivering judgment, Mr Justice Briggs said the “submission that differential treatment which is not founded on the special needs either of the proposed adoptive parents or the children, or upon any other class of justification recognised by the developing jurisprudence on Art 14, must be discriminatory commands real respect.

 [However] the very unusual predicament of Catholic Care, its status as an adoption agency of last resort for ‘hard to place’ children and the arguably pre-eminent needs of those children who will otherwise be left unadopted may constitute a very special and unusual case for recognition under Art 14.”

 

Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll