header-logo header-logo

07 June 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Adoption Agencies (Panel and Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/1410)

The Adoption Agencies Regulations 2005, SI 2005/389, is amended for cases where the adoption agency is considering whether the child ought to be placed for adoption.

Commencement date
1 September 2012

Legislation Affected

SI 2005/392, SI 2005/389 amended


Summary

Background

The aim of the adoption reform programme is to:

  • increase the number of adoptions of looked after children when it is in the child’s best interests; and
  • encourage more people to come forward to adopt, tackle delay and remove real or perceived barriers.

What’s Changing?

The Adoption Agencies Regulations 2005, SI 2005/389, is amended for cases where the adoption agency is considering whether the child ought to be placed for adoption. If they decide that the child should be placed, the agency must receive an application in writing and obtain information from a prospective adopter to assess their suitability to adopt a child. If the criteria is met, the local authority must then apply to the court for a placement order.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll