header-logo header-logo

Admiralty—Costs

17 November 2011
Issue: 7490 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

MIOM 1 Ltd and another company v Sea Echo E.N.E. (No 2) [2011] EWHC 2715 (Admlty), [2011] All ER (D) 51 (Nov)

 

CPR Pt 61 did not provide for costs on the indemnity basis where a CPR Pt 61 offer was successful, whereas CPR Pt 36 did provide for such costs when a CPR Pt 36 offer was successful. That was a clear indication that the authors of CPR Pt 61 did not intend that indemnity costs should be awarded merely because a CPR Pt 61 offer had been successful. In those circumstances, it was not appropriate in a collision action governed by CPR Pt 61 to order costs on an indemnity basis merely because an offer had been successful.
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll