header-logo header-logo

17 November 2011
Issue: 7490 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Admiralty—Costs

MIOM 1 Ltd and another company v Sea Echo E.N.E. (No 2) [2011] EWHC 2715 (Admlty), [2011] All ER (D) 51 (Nov)

 

CPR Pt 61 did not provide for costs on the indemnity basis where a CPR Pt 61 offer was successful, whereas CPR Pt 36 did provide for such costs when a CPR Pt 36 offer was successful. That was a clear indication that the authors of CPR Pt 61 did not intend that indemnity costs should be awarded merely because a CPR Pt 61 offer had been successful. In those circumstances, it was not appropriate in a collision action governed by CPR Pt 61 to order costs on an indemnity basis merely because an offer had been successful.
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

NEWS
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
back-to-top-scroll