header-logo header-logo

19 February 2009
Issue: 7357 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Adjudication and CVA's

Elspeth Owens highlights the relevance of the financial difficulties of a judgment creditor to the enforcement of an adjudicator’s award

CVAs & the enforcement of adjudicator awards

(Ref. NLJ, KnowHow,13 February 2009, p 228  and Mead General Building Ltd v Dartmoor Properties Ltd [2009] EWHC 200 (TCC))

 

Last week Janna Purdie discussed some of the issues affecting adjudication awards in the current economic climate. This week’s article examines the impact of Creditors Voluntary Agreements (CVAs) on the enforcement of an adjudicator’s award. Mr Justice Coulson, in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) held that:

 the fact that a claimant is the subject of a CVA is a relevant (but not conclusive) factor for the court to take into account when deciding whether to grant a stay of execution pursuant to RSC Order 47 after the grant of summary judgment to enforce an adjudicator’s decision.

 

Facts of the case

An adjudicator ordered (the employer) to pay sums just short of £350,000 to Mead (the contractor).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll