header-logo header-logo

17 July 2008 / Richard Burger
Issue: 7330 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

An adequate plug?

Richard Burger reports on the FSA's efforts to stop the leak of inside information from the unregulated sector

Last summer the Financial Services Athority (FSA) reviewed the controls over inside information during public takeover and merger transactions (see “Plugging the leaks” 157 NLJ 7287, p 1,222). The review considered how inside information leaks from such transactions, identified good practices to combat these leaks and suggested the introduction of a voluntary code for non-FSA regulated firms who participate in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) work. A year later, the FSA has published a set of Principles of Good Practice (the principles) for the handling of inside information, aimed at the unregulated sector.

The Market Misconduct Problem

The FSA aims to reduce the number of abnormal or informed price movements (IPMs) in advance of significant regulatory and/or takeover announcements to the market by listed companies. According to ongoing FSA research, in 2007 some 28.7% of M&A announcements were preceded by IPMs. It is entirely possible to attribute such movements to accurate financial analysis or deliberate strategic leakage of information by a target company, but IPMs still suggest market

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll