header-logo header-logo

‘Activist judges’ or an all-powerful justice secretary?

08 October 2025
Issue: 8134 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail
A future Conservative government would abolish the Sentencing Council and Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and sack judges who defended migrants’ rights, shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick has said

Addressing Conservative Party conference in Manchester this week, Jenrick criticised ‘activist’ judges and complained that ‘dozens of judges’ have ‘broadcast their open borders views’, supported migrant charities or ‘spent their whole careers fighting to keep illegal migrants in this country… The public rightly ask—how independent are they?’

Jenrick said the Conservatives would abolish the JAC and hand over the right to appoint judges to the justice secretary—restoring the old system that existed prior to Prime Minister Tony Blair’s reforms in 2006. The justice secretary would also set sentencing policy under a future Conservative government, while the Sentencing Council would be abolished.

Jenrick said the public were sick of ‘voting for tougher sentences and getting the opposite.

‘No longer will an unaccountable quango be able to subvert the will of the British people for criminals to be properly punished’.

In May, the government committed to introducing a presumption against short sentences and expanding the use of community sentencing, as recommended by Jenrick’s Conservative predecessor David Gauke, who served as justice secretary under Prime Minister Theresa May.

Party leader Kemi Badenoch used her conference speech to announce the next Conservative manifesto will contain a commitment to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and repeal the Human Rights Act.

However, Law Society president Richard Atkinson accused the Conservative Party of ‘putting political interest above the public good.

‘It protects us from the power of the state. Without the backstop of the ECHR, governments of whatever party will be able to erode our rights with no come-back. We can tighten border controls without stripping the British public of their rights under the ECHR.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll