header-logo header-logo

14 July 2016 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7707 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Act in haste…

nlj_7707_comment

If Brexit withdrawal cannot be reversed the UK is at risk of a seriously bad outcome, explains Michael Zander QC​

The discussion about triggering withdrawal from the EU has so far concentrated mainly on the question whether it requires Parliamentary approval. Little attention has yet been given to an even more troubling question—if withdrawal is started, could it be withdrawn mid-process?

A possible reason for wanting to withdraw might be so serious a downturn in the UK’s overall economic position as to persuade the government that Brexit should not after all go ahead. A completely different reason would be realisation that the terms for withdrawal on offer from the EU were completely unacceptable, or worse, that withdrawal was about to take place without terms having been agreed.

The issue is explored by Jonathan Rickford, former legal academic and senior legal civil servant and Robert (Bob) Ayling, former legal civil servant and CEO of BA (“Brexit Referendum and Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union: A Legal Trap: the Need for Legislation”).

Once the withdrawal process has begun by notification under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll