header-logo header-logo

30 September 2026
Issue: 8179 / Categories: Legal News , Charities , Collective action , Competition , Consumer
printer mail-detail

Access to justice funding in jeopardy

CILEX has urged the government to maintain the Access to Justice Foundation’s (AJF’s) status as the only charity entitled to undistributed damages and settlements from opt-out collective actions

The Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade is considering splitting undistributed funds between the AJF and the Consumers’ Association (Which?) or missing out the AJF entirely and giving everything to the Consumers’ Association. Its consultation, ‘Swifter and simpler competition redress’, closed last week.

In January 2026, the AJF received £3.7m in unclaimed damages from Justin Gutmann’s collective action settlement with Stagecoach South Western, following low take-up from class members. It used it to fund frontline legal services.

CILEX president Sara Fowler pointed to the AJF’s ‘proven track record’ of ensuring the funds ‘go where they will have the greatest possible impact’.

The Consumers’ Association, on the other hand, ‘is an entirely different type of organisation, one that principally operates a commercial model, with only around a quarter of its income related to consumer research and promoting consumer interests,’ Fowler said. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll