header-logo header-logo

23 January 2020 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Access all areas?

14469
John Cooper QC makes a case for open justice

The recent news that ministers have tabled draft legislation that would allow sentencing remarks from judges to be broadcast within two months has met with a mixed reception. The Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales said that the proposal to broadcast sentencing remarks was ‘well overdue’ and the Lord Chief Justice has also given an enthusiastic ‘thumbs up’ to the measure. Despite this, the Bar Council seem sceptical about the measure, warning that the move could turn sentencing into a ‘spectator sport’ and fretting that we must ‘guard against unwarranted attacks on judges where the sentence isn’t popular with the public’.

The Crown Court (Recording and Broadcasting) Order 2020 was laid in Parliament on 15 January and provides for cameras to broadcast the sentencing remarks by High Court and senior circuit judges in the Old Bailey and other high profile crown courts across the country and is a development of access given to the Court of Appeal in 2013, where three major broadcasters can apply to film judges delivering judgments, as well

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll