Allowing alleged abusers to cross examine their victims is a stain on the reputation of the family justice system. Jonathan Herring puts the case for reform
- Mr Justice Hayden expresses strong judicial disapproval that the law permits an alleged abuser to cross examine his victim in family cases.
- In fact finding hearings judge must rely on proven facts rather than suspicions.
Imagine suffering years of abuse. You finally escape and become involved in a dispute with your abuser over the children. You are not provided legal representation and must represent yourself. Even worse, you must face cross examination at the hands of the very person who has sought to control you for the past years. It sounds like something more from a feminist dystopia but occurs in the English Family Courts today.
The facts of Re A
Re A (A Minor (Fact Finding: Unrepresented Party) [2017] EWHC 1195 (fam), [2017] All ER (D) 49 (Jun) concerned a couple married in Pakistan. The mother arrived in the UK with their child (A) in 2014, but did not return to her husband as agreed. A dispute
