header-logo header-logo

A shift towards efficiency or unintended complexity?

04 April 2025 / Iris Karaman , Kate Chan
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ESG , Regulatory , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail
214570
Iris Karaman & Kate Chan discuss the practical impact of the EU’s proposed ‘Omnibus’ package
  • While the Omnibus presents relief for businesses, lessening compliance burdens, it does create uncertainty as to implementation across member states, especially while legislation is finalised.

The European Commission’s recently announced ‘Omnibus’ package consists of a wide range of proposed amendments to corporate sustainability requirements across key EU laws, including the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and the EU Taxonomy Regulation. The initiative seeks to alleviate regulatory burdens on businesses while maintaining the European Green Deal’s core objectives. However, the attempt to simplify sustainability compliance could introduce fresh legal uncertainties and diverging national implementations.

Omnibus package overview & rationale

The package is largely a response to industry concerns about excessive sustainability regulatory burdens and compliance costs, particularly for small and mid-sized enterprises. The EU’s ambitious sustainability agenda, while groundbreaking, has also been a source of frustration for companies caught in a web of overlapping and complex disclosure requirements,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll