header-logo header-logo

A question of expertise

255694
© Getty images

Affifa Farrukh & John F Mayberry examine whether clinicians & expert witnesses are always as qualified as they appear

The creation of foundation trusts gave hospital managements a wide range of powers. Among these was the ability to appoint consultants outside the guidelines promoted by the Royal Colleges and the General Medical Council (GMC). The purpose of those guidelines was to ensure a high-quality and consistent service to patients across the UK, and this included an insistence that candidates had completed a recognised training programme in the specialty either in the UK or other member states of the EU.

However, as a result of the loosening of this earlier control, there has been an exponential rise in the appointment of consultants to substantive posts who have not completed such a recognised training programme. Indeed, candidates are being appointed who have never successfully taken any postgraduate clinical examination in the UK or the EU. Nevertheless, their status within a trust is identical to that of consultants who are on the specialist register of the GMC, having completed a recognised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll