header-logo header-logo

A new dawn for supervision?

255676
© Getty images
Chris Dyke & Sophie Ruffles set out what the Financial Conduct Authority’s anti-money laundering takeover is likely to mean for law firms
  • HM Treasury plans to transfer anti-money laundering (AML) supervision of law firms to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) by 2029.
  • Although AML obligations will remain the same, firms should expect stricter oversight, stronger enforcement and greater focus on governance.

In June, HM Treasury published the consultation response on the powers the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) will have when it becomes supervisor for anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) compliance of professional services firms, including law firms.

The transfer of supervision to the FCA is intended to create a single, more robust structure with clearer accountability, improved transparency and stronger enforcement. The changes are subject to the passage of enabling legislation, confirmation of funding arrangements and the development of a detailed transition and delivery plan. In practice, this means that full implementation is unlikely to take effect until at least 2029.

Key challenges for law firms

It is not anticipated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll