header-logo header-logo

09 May 2025 / David Locke
Issue: 8115 / Categories: Opinion , Health & safety , Human rights
printer mail-detail

A matter of life & (assisted) death

217912
Unworkable & unethical? David Locke unpicks the flawed drafting of the End of Life Bill

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is a monumentally poor piece of drafting, unbecoming of the issue which it seeks to address. If we assume the point of principle is decided in favour of permitting ‘assisted dying’, the Bill proposes a framework which, insofar as it is comprehensible, is both unworkable and unethical. The following issues need to be addressed by Parliament.

Self-administration

If enacted in its current form, the Bill will make it permissible for a doctor to assist a person to ingest or otherwise self-administer the substance which will bring about the end of life; but it will not be legal to actually administer it. There is a modest attempt made to expand on this: it will be lawful for a doctor to ready the substance for administration; to ‘prepare a medical device’ to enable self-administration; and to ‘assist [the patient] to ingest or otherwise self-administer the substance’. The Bill seeks to establish a legal distinction between, for example,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll