header-logo header-logo

16 September 2020 / Amy Proferes
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

A long lease breach? Be specific!

27508
What happens when neighbours claim your tenants run a brothel? Amy Proferes looks at a recent case
  • Marchitelli v 15 Westgate Terrace looks at leaseholder’s responsibility for tenant’s illegal activities.
  • Where brothel-running is alleged, the leaseholder (lessee) should take prompt action.
  • The landlord’s notice should be specific.


A landlord wishing to forfeit a long lease of residential premises faces a daunting procedural labyrinth. The usual statutory notice under s 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925 must be served, specifying the breach complained of but, pursuant to s 168 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, this may only be done if either the lessee has admitted the breach or 14 days have elapsed since a court or tribunal has finally determined that the breach occurred. The recent decision in Marchitelli v 15 Westgate Terrace Ltd [2020] UKUT 192 (LC) shows that, even if an application for determination is successful, the landlord may still not be in a position to serve a valid s 146 notice if the determination is insufficiently detailed.

Marchitelli

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll