header-logo header-logo

12 May 2023 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 8024 / Categories: Opinion , CPR , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

A decade of Jackson

121674
How have Sir Rupert Jackson’s ground-breaking reforms to civil procedure fared ten years on? Dominic Regan considers the work done & the work to come

On 1 April 2013, over 100 amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules took effect. They stemmed from the magisterial review undertaken by Sir Rupert Jackson. The final piece of his reform programme arrives at long last on 1 October this year, with the drastic extension of fixed costs for most—but not all claims—worth up to £100,000.

Budgeting matters

How have the key 2013 reforms fared? I interviewed Sir Rupert on behalf of this magazine back then (‘Jackson on Jackson’, 162 NLJ 7504). My first question was: which single reform did he think was the most significant? Without missing a beat he said costs management. Budgeting from the outset, the prospective assessment of reasonable, proportionate expenditure was essential. As with any reform, there were teething problems, but it did settle down. Andrew McAulay at Clarion Solicitors deals with costs on behalf of over 200 law firms, and acts for some barristers as well.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll